<br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/12/07, <b class="gmail_sendername"><a href="mailto:JonIsaacs@aol.com">JonIsaacs@aol.com</a></b> <<a href="mailto:JonIsaacs@aol.com">JonIsaacs@aol.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><font face="arial,helvetica"><font face="Arial" lang="0" size="2">
As it is, I think most motorists, me included, have no expectations of reasonable behavior from someone on a bicycle and so treat cyclists as "loose cannons" that just might do anything.<br></font></font></blockquote>
<div><br>Exactly. And because of this, motorists get frustrated with bicyclists, especially when they can't figure out what they're doing.<br><br>I've found the best antidote to this is to be aware of motorists and their potential bewilderment and frustration, and to communicate my intent specifically to those who are likely to be wondering what I'm doing and are often (surprisingly) looking to me for direction on what they should do. It's very difficult if not impossible to do this effectively if your underlying belief is that it is a "battle" out there and motorists are the "enemy".
<br><br>It's counter-intuitive to be understanding, communicative, cooperative, helpful with, and seeking cooperation from, someone who feels like the "enemy" in a "battle". <br><br>So I have found that the "battle" paradigm, as exemplified by Michael Clarke's riding and words in the news piece, and echoed by cyclists endlessly, is counter-productive when one is cycling in traffic.
<br><br>Serge</div></div>