[SDCBC] Bogota vs. San Diego

[Steve McNeil]

Highway 52 is in San Clemente Canyon.  Rose Canyon is the next one north.
The Rose Canyon Bike Path ends there.  There is a good, well graded dirt
road going east from there and parallels the railroad track.  I rode my
mountain bike on it.  It goes east from near the bike path, goes underneath
Regents Road and underneath Genesee Avenue and beyond. That kind of
continuity is not possible in San Clemente Canyon as both Genesee and
Regents go all the way to the canyon floor there. It also has access to both
sides of each of these streets.  It has one deep dip that can be easily
circumvented.  I can just visualize it being paved as an extension of the
current Rose Canyon Bike Path,

It would also solve the problem of accessing the bike path for those who
come down La Jolla Colony Drive and get to the bike path.  They could get to
the bike path via this extension.

I thought this road is a fire access road but I am not sure.  It has that
deep dip that I can't imagine a fire truck getting through.

--Steve McNeil.


 -----Original Message-----
From: sdcbc-bounces at bikesandiego.org
[mailto:sdcbc-bounces at bikesandiego.org]On Behalf Of Jim Baross, Jr.
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 5:18 PM
To: Gene Carman; SDCBC
Subject: Re: [SDCBC] Bogota vs. San Diego


  Which one(s) first?

  My recommendation - Hwy 52, to/from Hwy 5 as far east as
possible/reasonable.
  We've tried several times. This canyon non-route is probably one of the
reasons SDCBC got started; a controversy w/the Sierra Club when 15 went in.

  Maybe there are other sites?

  At 02:05 PM 3/30/2008, Gene Carman wrote:


    Actually a bikepath "hiway" along the same routes of the existing
freeways would probably serve the largest population in the area due to
population growth that tends to occur along freeways.  Cyclists want to go
to the same locations as drivers.

    In many cases, there is a wider amount of land dedicated to the freeway
right of way then is actually used for freeway...  a single bikepath can be
created in less space then 2 new lanes on a freeway, and along the same
right of way.   Adding a 10 foot wide bikepath can reduce the traffic load
on a freeway more then adding two 10 foot wide lanes to a Freeway can reduce
congestion.

    Funding should come from the same agencies that fund Freeways...  bike
transportation facilities are simply another form of public transportation.

    OK, I've answered all the questions...  when do we get started?



    At 10:13 AM 3/30/2008, Jim Baross, Jr. wrote:

      I'm happy and supportive of Eric's inspirations! Speaking in
generalities, this sounds and could be wonderful... though you are likely to
read responses about how it couldn't or shouldn't be done.  :-(
      To seriously act on the inspiration - one that isn't BTW new to many
of us - something besides dreaming and typing needs doing, right?

      Now, a few task suggestions. Figure out exactly where you think such a
proposal would work in the San Diego area; a Bike Path or maybe a Bicycle
Boulevard or ? ... connecting what and following or creating what route...
then maybe think about/research an estimate of costs 'cause besides
location, cost matters big time! You might be ready then with a proposal
that SDCBC, an individual, or ? would propose to the site-owning agency for
funding. Sound exciting? Good, then do it.

      It's sort of useless to debate the generalities between facility types
when it's the specific site and uses that make for bigger differences, IMHO.
Let's get specific.
      * Ban all but bikes, transit and delivery vehicles in a downtown
area?... or impose single-occupancy vehicle use taxes for downtown like
London has?
      * Create a Bike Path/MUP/Bike Boulevard linking Mid City or UCSD/SDSU
or ? to Downtown or University Town Center/La Mesa or ?
      * what?

      Jim (likes dreams, lives reality) Baross

      At 01:52 AM 3/30/2008, Eric Converse wrote:

        I've been inspired.  These recent discussions on bicycle paths have
led me to create the following blog entry:

        San Diego and Bogota Columbia (a bicyle path comparison):
        www.ativsolutions.com/cblog

        In short, you'll notice that Bogota (serving a much larger, and
poorer, population) does a couple of things we don't do here.  Their bicycle
paths are contiguous and are routed through major population centers.  While
many of our bicycle paths, while pretty (riding next to the water
mainly),are often fragmented with huge gaps between them.  What we need are
long continuous paths (much like our freeway system) that provide a backbone
for this city's bicycle transportation network.  Needless to say we won't
always be on a bicycle path no matter how good we make the system, but we
can provide a network that links the city together and serves vastly more
people.

        Can't we do at least as good as a poor city in a third world
country?

        Eric
      _______________________________________________

      You are subscribed to the SDCBC mailing list as gcarman at san.rr.com
      To unsubscribe or change mailing options, go to
http://www.bikesandiego.org/mailman/listinfo/sdcbc
      List privacy information is located at
http://www.stickman-computing.org/aup
      For help or to talk with someone other than the mail robot, send
e-mail to postmaster at stickman-computing.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.bikesandiego.org/pipermail/sdcbc/attachments/20080330/b9c38d63/attachment.html