[SDCBC] avoiding hazards, what is reasonable...
Jim Baross
JimBaross at cox.net
Wed Feb 27 14:04:31 EST 2008
But if the agency owning a Bike Path did the
same, they'd have immunity, right? :-( I doubt it but wonder... fear...
At 11:46 AM 2/26/2008, Kathy Keehan wrote:
>Ok, so let me get this straight. A construction
>company leaves a couple of large timbers in the
>road (either they dropped off the truck or were
>left there for some reason, unmarked) in the
>dark. Its ok for them to do that and expect
>road users to just avoid them? If someone left
>an unmarked obstruction in the middle of the
>travel lane, a motorist hits is and is injured
>or killed, you can be sure that the construction
>company would have some explaining to do. Why
>would it be different for bicyclists?
>Im all for common sense, but come on
>Kathy
>
>------------------------------------------
>Kathy Keehan
>Executive Director
>San Diego County Bicycle Coalition
>P.O. Box 34544
>San Diego, CA 92163
>858.487.6063
>execdir at sdcbc.org
>www.sdcbc.org
More information about the SDCBC
mailing list