[SDCBC] FW: Update on I-5/SR 56 Interchange

[Tony Pietsch]

If you go to the the "Alternatives Considered-Withdrawn" link section, you
will find that the I-5 underpass tunnel was rejected by Caltrans as being
"too unstable" for automobiles, especially due to regular uncontrolled
flooding conditions.  My question is why then it is still on the table for
other forms of transportation (pedestrian, cycling, etc.) when Caltrans has
already analyzed it and rejected it for other vehicles?
 
Tony

  _____  

From: Faye Detsky-Weil [mailto:ffdw at san.rr.com] 
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 11:04 AM
To: 'Faye Detsky-Weil'
Subject: FW: Update on I-5/SR 56 Interchange



Updated information pertaining to the I-5 corridor and other projects is now
available on the Transnet website.

 

Go to http://www.keepsandiegomoving.com/I-5-FAQ.html 

 

>From here you can find additional information by clicking the tabs at the
top. If you click item 8, you will see '
<http://www.keepsandiegomoving.com/CW_Images/I-5-FAQ-556.pdf> Download the
I-5/SR-56 FAQ sheet (PDF 124kb)'. Click it to read FREQUENTLY ASKED
QUESTIONS for the I-5/SR-56 Interchange Project.
(http://www.keepsandiegomoving.com/CW_Images/I-5-FAQ-556.pdf) 

 

On the city website dated November 2007:
http://www.sandiego.gov/5_56freewayconnectors/pdf/sect3.pdf 

 

Alternatives Considered-Withdrawn:
http://www.sandiego.gov/5_56freewayconnectors/pdf/sect4.pdf 

 

 

Faye Detsky-Weil

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.bikesandiego.org/pipermail/sdcbc/attachments/20080414/ba9ab489/attachment.html