[SDCBC] Every Ghost Bike is A Caution
Danette Hoffert
danettehoffert at gmail.com
Sun Sep 23 19:29:25 EDT 2007
My question is, were there witnesses? With a deceased cyclist and the
driver as the witness and possible criminal, he/she has everything to gain
by blaming the victim.
On 9/21/07, Abulifia <abulifia1 at cox.net> wrote:
>
> I'd like to underscore that in no way was I attacking Mr. Issac. I agree
> 100% with him that as cyclists we should all learn the lesson in this tragic
> tale. But we don't have the police report and we haven't spoken with any
> witnesses, therefore, we will never have all the facts in this matter. For
> all we know, the cyclist in question was appropriately attired for night
> riding and his bike equipped with appropriate reflective/lighting devices,
> but again, unless someone exercises his California Public Records Act rights
> and requests the actual report from the PD, we'll never really know other
> than what we've read in the UT article. That said, perhaps my opinion
> translates too passionately regarding this matter because of my experience
> last year.
>
> I was struck in ::BROAD DAYLIGHT:: while crossing the street at a red
> light by a motorist who was too busy yakking on a cell phone and worrying
> about making his right hand turn on red to bother to see me on the bike
> ::DIRECTLY:: in front of him before he shot forward, knocking me out of the
> saddle and breaking my leg. As I lay there in shock, semi-unconscious and
> bleeding in the crosswalk, the PD was more interested in interrogating me as
> to what ::I:: did or did not do than posing the same line of questioning to
> the motorist. Their biggest concern was whether or not I was wearing a
> helmet. Long story short - the motorist basically got off scott free. I
> got a piddling settlement from his insurance company, but in no way did it
> compensate me for the year I was out of work because of this incident.
> Meanwhile, this same motorist is free to mow down someone else in another
> crosswalk on another day.
>
>
>
> Sachi Wilson wrote:
>
> I did not read that into Jon's comments, or into anyone's comments in
> this sad thread.
>
> We are vulnerable when we ride. It's a fact. We can act to
> understand how we become more or less vulnerable and then choose to
> ride or dress or equip ourselves in a way that lessens the
> vulnerabilities. That's not blaming the victim, it is learning from
> bad experiences.
>
> FWIW, I have FOUR flashing taillights on my commuting bike. All of
> them should be visible from the side. I use a NightRider headlight.
> I also wear a light-colored jacket with reflective strips
> everywhere. It was enough to scare away the cars in rainy dark
> Seattle; it works down here too.
>
> Sachi Wilson
> *Safety Queen*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> You are subscribed to the SDCBC mailing list as danettehoffert at gmail.com
> To unsubscribe or change mailing options, go to
> http://www.bikesandiego.org/mailman/listinfo/sdcbc
> List privacy information is located at
> http://www.stickman-computing.org/aup
> For help or to talk with someone other than the mail robot, send e-mail to
> postmaster at stickman-computing.org
>
--
Danette M. Hoffert's email
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.bikesandiego.org/pipermail/sdcbc/attachments/20070923/a1552862/attachment.html
More information about the SDCBC
mailing list