[SDCBC] ignoring a detour & bike lane closed signs
JonIsaacs at aol.com
JonIsaacs at aol.com
Sat Jun 9 22:25:13 EDT 2007
In a message dated 6/9/07 6:29:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
j.eldon at sbcglobal.net writes:
> I do not think the bike lane itself is the problem on southbound Gilman at
> the I-5 onramp, although I would support terminating the approach segment of
> it farther upstream.
___
I ride through there several times a week... The bike lane is the problem
because it tries to separate cyclists from motorists. It's a real catch 22.
The current bike lane is unrideable because of motorists turning right across
the bike lane. The only reasonable place to ride is in the left lane along
with the straight-through traffic, otherwise you are vulnerable to motorists
right hooking you. If there were no bike lane, then motorists could make the
right turn from center lane and it would help the flow of traffic.
This would naturally calm traffic because there would be many more of those
motorists during rush hour...
So you have a bike lane that one should not ride that results in a decrease
in traffic flow and only results in more confusion ....
I think I can conclude that indeed the bike lane is the problem.
jon
**************************************
See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.bikesandiego.org/pipermail/sdcbc/attachments/20070609/04754c11/attachment.html
More information about the SDCBC
mailing list