[SDCBC] Ca Street & Highway Code Archie Moore Freeway

J. W. Stump jwstump at cox.net
Thu Aug 30 19:07:00 EDT 2007


Dear Friends;

If you are negotiating with CaLTRANs  do not depend on the City or SANDAG staff for representing our best interests.  You must get your own engineers and lawyers.

The most feature filled Freeway in the County is the SR -15 (Archie Moore) through the Mid City.  The only way we were able to get the features on this Freeway that we did is that the City Heights community had its own lawyers and engineers.  You must find the sections of the California Street & Highway Code http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html  and  CA Administrative Code http://www.calregs.com/linkedslice/default.asp?SP=CCR-1000&Action=Welcome  that concern provision and continuation of bicycle routes when interrupted by the state construction.  Listing of the crossings as mitigation is a boon.

City Heights depended on City and SANDAG staff for completion of the Mid City Bike Route to Mission Valley and the light Rail Trolley in the freeway median.  You can see how well these staffs did on your next bike ride to Mission Valley or Trolley ride on the 15. [Nearly 20 years of waiting}

If you want some practical advice on CALTRANs call Jay Powell at the City Heights CDC 584-1535.

My vote is for both an environmental animal undercrossing with path and a human overcrossing to continue the current uses..  Make sure that you specify that the width of the crossing be large enough to accommodate a police patrol car < Compare overcrossins on the 15 Freeway in City Heights versus the non patrol car size in Normal Heights>.

All the best
John Stump
4133 Poplar
City Heights, California 92105

This information is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

No promise of action or legal representation is made by receipt of this message.  Sender's intent is to discuss matters generally in a hypothetical manner.  A written agreement of legal representation, signed by all parties, is required to form a new valid attorney client relationship. Absent such written agreement no claim for fees will be made and no legal action taken.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tony Pietsch 
  To: 'Kathy Keehan' 
  Cc: 'Sdcbc' 
  Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 3:33 PM
  Subject: Re: [SDCBC] tabulating the results so far onSVRBridge/Undercrossingquestion


  Kathy--

  I'm curious as to what event triggered this poll?  

  I've also been attending some of the Torrey Pines Community Planning Board
  meetings and directly experienced the angst of neighbors who are concerned
  about the addition of the two I-5 (to/from the North) to SR-56 "fly-over"
  interconnects that Caltrans is driving to finish.  Is this related, and if
  so is the money for bike/pedestrian access the typical 1%-3% of total cost
  that the contractors can add on so long as this access is directly related
  to the cost of the freeway fly-over construction?

  If so, this whole discussion trigger may be a ruse to distract us and either
  get more money or enlist the bicycling community's support for yet another
  boondoggle in San Diego to support freeway construction. (I'm trying to
  refrain from using stronger language here to keep things civil.)

  I, too, would rather see money spent first on the rather simple upgrades to
  pave the connections on both sides of El Camino Real to the SR-56 bike path
  as a first step, and pave the remainder of the SV path to Class I standards
  before any under/overpass of I-5 is considered.  If the money is sufficient
  and of the general allocation sort, the rest of the SR-56 bike path sorely
  needs "fixing" to meet the originally agreed upon (I think it was sometime
  around 1994) standards at multiple points and intersections for the SR-56
  bike path between I-5 and I-15.

  Some clarity as to where this is coming from could help focus the
  discussion.

  Thanks,
  Tony

  -----Original Message-----
  From: sdcbc-bounces at bikesandiego.org [mailto:sdcbc-bounces at bikesandiego.org]
  On Behalf Of Carol D. Carr
  Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:49 PM
  To: 'Thomas Reynolds'; 'Kathy Keehan'
  Cc: 'Sdcbc'
  Subject: Re: [SDCBC] tabulating the results so far onSVRBridge/Undercrossing
  question

  I must agree with Thomas Reynolds. Unlike some grade-separated crossings
  further east on the SR56 bikeway, this particular undercrossing would be
  dark, low-ceilinged, sometimes wet, and inviting to the homeless. I would be
  nervous passing through. Therefore, I vote for an overcrossing. 
  Actually I think a higher priority should be FINISHING the 2 SR56 bikeway
  access points from El Camino Real and the dirt/sand patch on the Sorrento
  Valley bikeway near the north end. They've been an embarrassment for many
  years, and a reminder of how little attention the city pays to bicyclists'
  requests. I've asked repeatedly. 
  Carol Carr


  -----Original Message-----
  From: sdcbc-bounces at bikesandiego.org [mailto:sdcbc-bounces at bikesandiego.org]
  On Behalf Of Thomas Reynolds
  Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 11:34 AM
  To: Kathy Keehan
  Cc: Sdcbc
  Subject: Re: [SDCBC] tabulating the results so far on
  SVRBridge/Undercrossing question

  I vote for the undercrossing.

  Having said that, I'd like to point out another problem with the
  undercrossing.  Beside the water table it could also become a haven for
  homeless people.  It is now.  Some cyclist, especially those who commute at
  night, may not want to take the route if they don't feel safe.

  Tom

  On 8/30/07, Kathy Keehan <execdir at sdcbc.org> wrote:
  >
  >
  >
  >
  > So far I've received 17 responses, with the following breakdown
  >
  > 9 for the bridge
  >
  > 3 'it depends'
  >
  > 5 for the undercrossing
  >
  >
  >
  > Several people have mentioned that the cost differential and the 
  > flooding issues would be a major determination for them one way or the 
  > other. I didn't want to bias the results just on costs, so I 
  > deliberately held that info back. The estimates (keep in mind these 
  > are estimates and to be taken with a grain of salt. they actual costs 
  > will almost certainly be higher for either option) - $1.4 million for 
  > the undercrossing, $7.9 million for the bridge overcrossing. Before 
  > you start freaking out, keep in mind that the proposed managed lanes 
  > for the I-5 corridor are estimated to cost $2.9 BILLION dollars, and 
  > the managed lanes under construction along I-15 right now are about
  > $1.3 BILLION dollars. $1.5 million is significant, but not huge. $8
  million is a lot, but maybe be worth it for a signature project.
  >
  > The flooding issues are significant. The bike path surface will be 
  > very close to the existing water table. I think that during wet years 
  > there will be many times when the bike path will not be usable.
  >
  > Now that you know the other circumstances, anyone want to change their
  vote?
  >
  > Kathy
  >
  >
  >
  > ------------------------------------------
  >
  > Kathy Keehan
  >
  > Executive Director
  >
  > San Diego County Bicycle Coalition
  >
  > P.O. Box 34544
  >
  > San Diego, CA 92163
  >
  > 858.487.6063
  >
  > execdir at sdcbc.org
  >
  > www.sdcbc.org
  >
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  >
  > You are subscribed to the SDCBC mailing list as 
  > thomas.treynolds at gmail.com To unsubscribe or change mailing options, 
  > go to http://www.bikesandiego.org/mailman/listinfo/sdcbc
  > List privacy information is located at 
  > http://www.stickman-computing.org/aup
  > For help or to talk with someone other than the mail robot, send 
  > e-mail to postmaster at stickman-computing.org
  >
  _______________________________________________

  You are subscribed to the SDCBC mailing list as caroldcarr at sbcglobal.net To
  unsubscribe or change mailing options, go to
  http://www.bikesandiego.org/mailman/listinfo/sdcbc
  List privacy information is located at http://www.stickman-computing.org/aup
  For help or to talk with someone other than the mail robot, send e-mail to
  postmaster at stickman-computing.org

  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.10/977 - Release Date: 8/28/2007
  4:29 PM
   

  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.10/977 - Release Date: 8/28/2007
  4:29 PM
   

  _______________________________________________

  You are subscribed to the SDCBC mailing list as tony at tonypietsch.com To
  unsubscribe or change mailing options, go to
  http://www.bikesandiego.org/mailman/listinfo/sdcbc
  List privacy information is located at http://www.stickman-computing.org/aup
  For help or to talk with someone other than the mail robot, send e-mail to
  postmaster at stickman-computing.org


  _______________________________________________

  You are subscribed to the SDCBC mailing list as jwstump at cox.net
  To unsubscribe or change mailing options, go to http://www.bikesandiego.org/mailman/listinfo/sdcbc
  List privacy information is located at http://www.stickman-computing.org/aup
  For help or to talk with someone other than the mail robot, send e-mail to postmaster at stickman-computing.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.bikesandiego.org/pipermail/sdcbc/attachments/20070830/4238ab0d/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the SDCBC mailing list