[SDCBC] SR56-Sorrento Valley Road connector
Trevor Bourget
trevorspoke at cox.net
Thu Aug 30 02:28:56 EDT 2007
At 10:01 PM 8/29/2007, Gene Carman wrote:
>I would much rather see the existing bike path completed, rather
>than another half effort at something else.
All of the efforts are important. Some are more important.
>I am particularly interested in "doing it right," which includes
>putting "walk" buttons on the proper side of the existing intersections as
>cycle traffic moves along the right side of the path, and the repair
>of the weir, to prevent flooding.
We should have bicycle-sensitive traffic loops, not walk buttons.
Eventually the remaining interchanges should all have flyovers. Black
Mountain Road is already bad, and should give a hint how bad they all
will eventually get.
We need visually distinct and preferably height-separated area for
pedestrian travel on the bike highway. Vehicle code should apply to
ped/bike interaction.
The west end of the path was designed as a nature trail, and needs
more help to be brought up to bike highway standards.
These issues make the current project substandard. But most
importantly, a highway that ends in a field is not a finished project
at all. sr56 bike highway must connect to svr, and svr must be built
into a bike highway. This network has the potential to be the icon of
bicycle-friendly San Diego.
-- Trevor
More information about the SDCBC
mailing list