[SDCBC] What is it going to take to finish the 56 path?

[markw]

Serge Issakov wrote:
> Ah, but there is a legal mandate to design and maintain streets to certain
> standards.
> 
> Not so for paved bike paths, as confirmed by the recent CA Supreme Court
> decision to not review the Prokop appeal.
> 
> You can't blame them for giving higher priority to projects that they are
> legally mandated to design and maintain to certain standards, can you?
> 
> Serge

There's legal mandates for quite a bit of stuff.  I find it humorous and
sad that they can't even pave a street to it's full width (kearney villa
 road, SR76), or make legal width bike lanes (mast blvd in santee).
Between property, road tax, income tax, sales tax, regulatory tax er
fees,  you'd think we'd have roads as smooth as glass to ride on.  :)

Mark